I want you to imagine someone like Jenovah's Witnesses trying to moralize people on the Internet. how successful do you estimate such effort might be?

▲

an hour ago | parent | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

spuz an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

A costs less than B so we should do A is hardly a moral argument.

▲

vlyan an hour ago | parent [-]

and life of subsistence farming in the countryside costs two orders of magnitude less of carbon sin that life in the city, where everything the enlightened cosmopolitan consumes is delivered by carbon-chugging trucks, freighters, and planes from hundreds and thousands miles away.

but the line is clearly drawn at performative sacrifice, not substantial.

	▲	alpineman 19 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Livestock is 14.5% of global emissions. Food is about 1/3rd of each individual's emissions. A plant based diet can cut that by 50-75%. How is that not substantial?