| ▲ | olalonde 5 hours ago | |||||||||||||
By the way, the stat you mention counts consensual arrangements as wage theft, probably the large majority of it (e.g. hiring illegal immigrants for under the minimum wage). Calling that "theft" is a rhetorical move, much like libertarians calling taxation "theft": it borrows the moral weight of stealing for something that's legally and morally quite different. If the stat had been calculated from asking workers, "does your employer owe you money that they refuse to pay?", I suspect the number would drop dramatically. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | deadonarrival 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
You don't think large corporations are stealing from their workers? | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ModernMech 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Calling the arrangements consensual is also a rhetorical move. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | roosterIllusi0n 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
Wage theft is a real crime and you don't get to rename it because your feelings are somehow hurt. Calling taxation "theft" is just vapid right wing mccarythism. Rich people paid mccarthy money to lie over and over again because at the time it was illegal to broadcast those lies on tv or radio. But a senator was immune and could lie all they wanted. You are never going to be right about anything if you actually think what you posted makes any sense. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||