| ▲ | onlyrealcuzzo 6 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
> Crystal is like a typed Ruby with the performance and concurrency flow of Go. I'm not up to date, but the scheduling engine was far behind Go in terms of parallelism. Crystal was always quite good at concurrency. But Go is popular because it's so good at parallelism (and relatively safe with a garbage collector). I know Crystal has been working on this for the last few releases, but I'd be surprised if it's matching Go on parallelism. Go's runtime is quite the engineering feat. It can often outperform hand-optimized Rust in worst-case parallel workloads (p99), despite Rust having a number of pretty huge advantages... | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | straight-shoota 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Crystal core dev speaking. In the previous release (1.21) we enabled Execution Contexts as a parallelism engine. https://crystal-lang.org/2026/07/12/releasing-execution-cont... It's even more flexible than Go because you can tune different contexts for specific workloads. Go still has more advanced optimizations and overall better thread-safety in libraries. But we're working on that... | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | pjmlp 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Go is popular because Docker and Kubernetes made it popular, and it was designed by UNIX idols. If only it had a few more features from 1970's languages, designed outside Bell Labs, or even those from Limbo that it still doesn't support. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | giancarlostoro 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Goroutines are roughly 2kb in memory, and Crystal fibers are roughly 4KB, which is insane in any regard. I think Crystal is really interesting and worth considering, especially if you want something native that has OOP, I really would love to see Crystal used more in general. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | goatlover 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Does it outperform Erlang/OTP? | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | DetroitThrow 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
>It can often outperform hand-optimized Rust in worst-case parallel workloads (p99), despite Rust having a number of pretty huge advantages... I will say this comes with the asterisk that it heavily depends on what your concurrent system/problems looks like! ...but more often than not when dealing with web problems and network IO, the shape of concurrency/parallelism I need looks exactly like Goroutines, and even as someone who uses Rust/tokio daily: the Go runtime is an incredibly engineered system that usually beats Rust in my experience for application dev tasks. Anyways, I love Crystal's syntax around concurrency! I wish we lived in a world where it had tons of Google engineers optimizing the runtime :) | |||||||||||||||||