Everybody laughed when they said GPT-2 wasn’t safe to release. This is the tip of the iceberg.

skinfaxi 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

LLMs had nothing to do with this.

I think we live in an age where programming mistakes should be attributed to llm by default. In the old days, it was just the coder and stack overflow to blame, now its layer on layer of ai assisted work, from ceo level on down. Something we haven’t perfected yet: how to prove 0 ai use in a product. Until we get there, we have to assume llm are everywhere and that their use carries liability risk.

	▲	bigfishrunning 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Nobody takes PKI seriously. This will continue to happen, AI or no AI.

▲

bottlepalm 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You spent the last 4 years coping; calling AI a stochastic parrot, and saying the warnings were all marketing. You wasted 4 years. Good job.

	▲	skinfaxi 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		What?

▲

bigfishrunning 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Good. Let it burn. It's not that GPT-x is dangerous, it's that the security practices that it's pointing out are.

I wish any company that gets sunk by this a very happy go-out-of-business.