> Worth noting too that this would have easily fetched >$50k

More like $30k, no ("system processes allowing piracy")?

Ah, you're right! Depends on their generosity, but I'd imagine piracy and running exclusives on non-Nintendo hardware is more of a risk to their business than a bootROM exploit.

	▲	TuxSH 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The category they list in the $50k context are PSC exploits, or TSEC coprocessor exploit when executing the secure code that bootROM provides it. So, presumably, current and future key material compromission like on Switch 1

▲

voidUpdate 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Who gets the bounty money in that case? By the looks of the article, Codex did all of the work actually finding a bug. Shouldn't the money go to OpenAI?

	▲	TaLiTr an hour ago \| parent [-]
		The person running it obviously. How is that even a real question? Since when did an AI lab have the right to anything a paid user generated?