I love how someone's security disaster becomes someone else's feature.

I agree. We may as well make some lemonade out of these lemons. IMHO the ability of companies to 'securely' close off hardware and software from their users is a sad casualty of the success of cryptography, and not a feature.

As the percentage of technology controlled by people actively using it to do evil increases, so does the net value to society of a trivially-expliotable zero-day.

To some it's not really "security". At least it's not securing them from their greatest "threat" (read: annoyance): so-called "tech" companies engaged in data collection, surveillance and advertising services

In fact, it's securing _the companies_ against potential competitors and users who might raise privacy concerns

The Fortune 500 "MiTM's" TLS traffic from their local networks

Every individual with a local network should also be doing this

I prefer haproxy to mitmproxy. It's faster

I seriously laughed at the flag. public wifi is going to be lit.