aprilthird2021 5 hours ago

It's a very good point. The further upon appeal Meta goes, the more removed they get from a jury and they'll be more likely to get a favorable ruling due to the company's negative approval rating amongst the public

▲

freejazz 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's not a jury verdict. Crazy how much that needs to be repeated in this thread.

	▲	loeg 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		A jury is involved in the process. If the jury doesn't find violations, the judge can't assign penalties for those violations. > The jury concluded that Meta had more than 43 million violations of the state’s unfair practices act, with each transgression carrying a civil penalty as high as $5,000. Note that this is like, 20 violations per resident of New Mexico. And also ~50% of Facebook's total revenue (more than 100% of income) at the time of the CA scandal.
	▲	cwnyth 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		No one reads the article anymore. They're just vibe commenting.

▲

throwaway894345 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Presumably it’s also easier to influence judges than random jurors.