I'm not American. I chose to use American terms they have (from what I understand) the simplest definition in that it is considered absolute. Other countries have concessions for things like hate speech and other such matters (and yes, there is a lot of nuance to it). But my point was is that "free speech" is in regards to how the government treats you, not: "I can come to your business and treat you like shit and you have to sit there and take it."

EDIT: I just realized you were not responding to me... oops!

All good. Still an interesting comment.

My point (less snarkily this time) was that their definition (it's only an issue when the government limits your speech) is really quite narrow.