| ▲ | ZeroCool2u 4 hours ago | |
It's an OpenAI Dot/Open Claw competitor. Doesn't really seem to differentiate itself meaningfully at first glance. If I want a persistent agent, I'm still not sure why I'd pick one where I'm locked into a specific model family. Having it "just work" is nice! But this feels like a product area where not being locked into one garden is more important and the net gains are greater. | ||
| ▲ | csallen 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
> I'm still not sure why I'd pick one where I'm locked into a specific model family I'm guessing mostly because they subsidize a lot of the costs | ||
| ▲ | LUmBULtERA 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
I like Muse, and OpenAI's Dot. But what will differentiate this for me is the model. I grew frustrated with Muse's lackluster model, and increasingly with OpenAI's Dot as even if it implements my asks with Astra I just have not been to happy with the output. If Claude/Opus can do better, that's all the differentiation I need. | ||
| ▲ | 0gs 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
the trick imo is Opus 5.5 is the only differentiator you need. remember that ClawdBot dba OpenClaw began as a way to harness some ancient Claude model (4.5? lolll) in an always on Telegrammable agent. | ||