Right, so what I am seeing is that someone goes, "Hey, holding up the money that congress appropriated is overstepping what has historically been the legislative branches power and usurping it to be an excecutive branch power" and then I look at the specific instances they mention and come to the same or a similar conclusion, I am performing confirmation bias, but you reading their example and equating it to "they don't like Trump" is pure analysis.

▲

mangodrunk a day ago | parent [-]

From the other perspective, they think they have the legal right to do so and that they are wanting to limit wasteful spending. This is still very much inline with working within the constitution. How do you think this is king-like behavior?

▲

JayNitram a day ago | parent [-]

For that specific case? Pretty simple, many of his actions that held up congressionally appropriated funds were found unconstitutional in a number of federal courts. Add to that there being a seeming intention to 'claim' that power and authority by this administration gives a few flags. I guess I need to know what you definition of a President overstepping his powers would be?

	▲	mangodrunk a day ago \| parent [-]
		That’s a great question. I would think doing something unconstitutional ruled by the court after the ruling.