> Essentially impossible if it were randomly selected.

You would say the same of any seed I gave you. You've just artificially assigned this number with some sort of emotional importance.

If you cherry-pick that statement in isolation you're technically correct. But in practice the whole comment you're replying to is actually correct, in this case if you saw the number four, one would be correct in concluding that's unlikely and searching other low digit numbers, the proof of that is that it happened here.

They had multiple keys and 7 of the keys were numbers less than 256.