| ▲ | Jeep_ 3 hours ago |
| Pure marketing, it's getting increasingly hard to separate actual technical feats of agents from marketing pretentious declarations. Such a terrible environment to navigate right now. |
|
| ▲ | redanddead 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| What’s worse is that this is part of a larger strategy of scaring the public to get regulatory capture It’s just gross and manipulative. You have no moat, get over it pAtCh ThE pLaNeT today, tomorrow it's creepy rent-seeking behavior |
| |
| ▲ | orangedog an hour ago | parent [-] | | Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Do you prefer they not engage in helping finding vulns at all? Do you not think there are parts of the company interested in security and doing it for the sake of that? I feel like taking every action these companies take as part of some larger strategy is kind of conspiracy-minded. | | |
| ▲ | redanddead an hour ago | parent [-] | | Why didn't OAI go back to non-profit again? Where's the conspiracy. There is no moat. The technology is easily reproducible. Deepseek unwound an entire business model yesterday. | | |
| ▲ | orangedog 42 minutes ago | parent [-] | | The conspiracy theory is suggesting this is part of a larger strategy. I'm just saying it's a big enough company with a wide enough range of beliefs that I find it pretty likely that the direct motives for this weren't to enable regulatory capture. But they could be, that's why it's a conspiracy theory. | | |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | Frieren 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Not marketing. It is a crime related to fraud or securities fraud. |
| |
| ▲ | orangedog 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | You're claiming this is securities fraud? | | |
| ▲ | recursive 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Not only that, but everything else is also securities fraud. | |
| ▲ | Frieren 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | What is your argument to say that lying to investors and shareholder is not a crime? It seems a weird position to defend. | | |
| ▲ | orangedog 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | They aren't lying, they are saying their tool was used in the process of finding this bug. Was it not? | | |
| ▲ | esseph an hour ago | parent [-] | | With this bug, it was not. See above comments. | | |
| ▲ | orangedog an hour ago | parent [-] | | > Calif identified a critical flaw using GPT‑5.6 Sol as part of our Patch the Planet (opens in a new window) initiative > 19–24 August 2026: Wiz Research independently collides with the same bug family using Wiz Atlas, Gemini 4 Argon, and GPT-5.6 Sol, reporting its variants on 24 August. I again ask how they are lying? I get if people hate these companies, but blatantly disregarding what is said helps nobody. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | shimman 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's not hard tho, the default mode of thinking should be to never trust what a US corporation says. |
| |
| ▲ | giantg2 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Why limit only to the US? | | |
| ▲ | shimman 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | US corporations benefit from US corruption and US imperialism. Hard to not think of a more destructive force currently in the world. | | |
| ▲ | cyanydeez an hour ago | parent [-] | | keep in mind, the point of most views is a toddler who lies about stealing a cooking isn't corrupt, because they're a child and can't do anything. The same view point is used for racism, dei, and the rest: it doesn't matter if the poor beggar on the corner hates white people. They don't have any means or methods to act on it. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | alper 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| This isn't a security incident as much as it is a marketing opportunity for all these companies. |
