| ▲ | _Microft a day ago | ||||||||||||||||
I just read the article and can not make any sense of your comment. It does not relate to anything of the actual article content (but only superficially to the title itself). | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dTal a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Many Worlds Hypothesis is the extrapolation of taking Hilbert Space at face value, and dumping concepts like "wave function collapse" which privilege a particular future as the "real one that happened". There's a possible future where you're President, but no possible future where you're a talking cucumber. This intuitive fact gets overlooked in pop culture explorations of Many Worlds, such as Everything Everwhere All At Once, which has ridiculous parallel universes which obey the rather more relaxed rules of "anything the writers can think of that looks silly", rather than "anything which can conceivably happen". | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | gus_massa a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The article is probably good but the title is a mix of clickbait and nonsense. I'm tired, I'll skip the article. (Note that the author many times is not the person that choose the title.) | |||||||||||||||||