| ▲ | ketzu 5 hours ago | |||||||
> We don't really need multiple exits in case of fire because fires are occurring less often and people are getting plenty of warning. Based on the video, external fire exits were a bad idea from the start and were recommended against 150 years ago, but inertia is hard to overcome. (unless I Completely misunderstood) | ||||||||
| ▲ | anamexis 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
And the problem with interior fire escape stairs was solved by encasing them in concrete and adding self-closing doors to prevent updrafts. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | bluGill 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
External fire escapes are the best they could do 150 years ago with existing buildings that were a fire trap and clearly better than nothing. However even then they knew they were not ideal. | ||||||||