So you're upset that Google et al can't dictate who has authority over .com with DANE? Because yes, that's how DNS is supposed to work and also how domain validated web PKI works because that's just a glorified DNS consensus system which happens to give bullying power to browsers and root store operators. It would be up to ICANN (or countries for ccTLDs) to determine if the issue warants replacing the operator.

No, I think that state-controlled naming authorities shouldn't control cryptographic keys, for the reasons laid out on this and numerous other threads about DANE.

You know you're in trouble when you see people talking about "bullying" from the browsers, who are the only reason we have certificate transparency and don't have CAs literally selling root certificates to big companies to run their own private CAs.