Not according to many worlds! I think nowadays many physicists think many worlds/an everettian view is most plausible

You’ve probably been reading a lot of physicists that believe in the Many Worlds view. Nature did a poll of physicists last year[1] and it’s still only the third most popular interpretation, behind the Copenhagen Interpretation and information-based interpretations like QBism.

[1] https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2025/07/favored-explanations...

	▲	dbvdh 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yeah, this is also why I said many and not most :) But I think if you ask experts (philosophers of nature, people into foundational quantum mechanics) most of them would be many worlds proponents. I finished my masters in a quantum computing lab. The reality is that most physicists just don't care about foundational QM, and stick to the Copenhagen interpretation. To me the Copenhagen Interpretation does not even count as a complete theory. It just stays very fuzzy on when wave function collapse happens, which makes it impossible to falsify.