| ▲ | gnabgib 9 hours ago | |
Yeah.. their text (unedited).. Maybe they meant 5.6? Only 8.x is "supported" currently, though. I wonder how 3&4 avoided it :) | ||
| ▲ | cesarb 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
> I wonder how 3&4 avoided it :) Probably the same way log4j 1.x avoided log4shell: the vulnerable code was introduced on a later release. | ||
| ▲ | Perz1val 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
A: I'm writing a post, what versions B: "5.6, 7, 8“ A: fixes a "typo" ok so "5, 6, 7, 8" | ||