The funny to me is that without context there’s no way to know which ideological bias you mean. Just looking at the parts of Wikipedia I routinely use I don’t see much of a bias beyond one that favors more verbose articles.

I’ve routinely heard “Wikipedia is becoming ideological,” and it’s usually action flip as to whether they thinks it’s too far to the left or right.

If you find an article is too long to read comfortably, please consider adding {{too long|date=October 2026}} (or whatever the date at the time is) to the top so that people can figure out what to do with it.

Sorry, I should have included this in my comment. I'm referring to pages on communism or communism adjacent topics, socialism and the middle eastern conflicts involving Isreal. I find a lot of the communist pages use sources that have 'a marxist perspective of history' which is ahistorical. The middle east articles involving Isreal use a lot of sources known to be unreliable like middleeasteye and Al-jazeera. They also receive a a ton of traffic from both sides as they're using wikipedia to fight over history.