| ▲ | Avicebron a day ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sure, but Chetty et al were measuring based on the top-1% of income, the private elementary schools are acting like filters based on income. Yes, they can buy more access to things that will weigh heavily on an admissions acceptance, but that's a filter by parental income which is well known... I suppose the argument is that a hard working kid from a lower income family can test into a private elementary school on a scholarship? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | drivebyhooting a day ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No. Spar this with AI. The 2X multiplier is AFTER controlling income. What you’re saying is just a comfortable lie to make people feel better about public schooling. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||