| ▲ | runj__ a day ago |
| Yes, they _hope_ they can verify that the outcome of giving someone they trust a gun will not end in the end of the world. I wouldn't trust you with a gun of mine... I don't know you. |
|
| ▲ | 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | throwaway_20161 a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| And what makes you trust them, with the “gun”? |
| |
| ▲ | red75prime a day ago | parent [-] | | It's less likely to have an omnicidal maniac in a group of 100 people than in a group of a few billion people. | | |
| ▲ | yunnpp a day ago | parent [-] | | That assumes you have no prior knowledge of either group. | | |
| ▲ | red75prime a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Which prior knowledge do we have? A group of engineers managed by public figures that show no signs of omnicidality. A large group of people of all walks, which is very hard to vet. | |
| ▲ | xvector a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | No, this is just basic probability. |
|
|
|