There won’t be a labor market any more, unless there’s some technological barrier for AIs and robots that has not appeared yet.

It’s either some form of socialism or mass starvation.

baal80spam a day ago | parent | next [-]

> socialism or mass starvation

From what history shows, there's not much difference between the two.

	▲	amanaplanacanal 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I dunno. Inside most families seems to be almost a perfect socialism. From each according to his abilities... Scaling it up is hard, though.

nradov a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Most of the major mass starvation events in modern history were caused by some form of socialism.

	▲	myersj a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Well that's certainly engaging with the meat of his comment, instead of the HN equivalent spamming stupid X clapbacks for likes. Bravo. I guess you needed some validation today.
	▲	datsci_est_2015 a day ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Lmao. This comment combined with the one above are just a microcosm of the worst HN has to offer. What sort of socialism was at play when the British forced Ireland into famine during the potato blight? What about the British role in India’s famine? What about the many famines brought about by civil wars and ethnic conflicts in Africa? The Great Depression, famously brought about by socialist policies and definitely not gilded age wealth inequality decadence? If you’re looking for a common thread, it’s authoritarianism, not socialism.
	▲	jimbokun a day ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		I don’t disagree, but I’m not seeing many other options here. Modern Western European socialism has probably suppressed wages and increased unemployment relative to the US, but hasn’t led to starvation.
	▲	15 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]