The irony is the article is very sloppy. Can we at least write it and review it properly..

36 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

[deleted]

antipaul an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is true. I was unfamiliar with this concept (I use codex/claude daily), and am trying to get to the "bottom line".

Oh, it's there at bottom under "my takeaway". But I still didn't get it initially.

Slop Code Bench? Need a Slop Writing Bench too

jampekka 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

What's wrong with it? Reads fine to me.

	▲	a3w 35 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		There are 36 tests. You can pass 0 or 36 or any number inbetween. Lets give five significant digits of how accurate solving was. That is not how data physics work. It should not be how data science works.