| ▲ | sippingabonedry 3 hours ago | |
Didn't Let's Encrypt have to jump through all sorts of hoops to prove they were competent and trustworthy before that happened? Now it's coming out these guys used "4" as a private key. That's a crazy amount of incompetence and malfeasance. Did they vibe-code a CA? HOW DOES THIS HAPPEN? I am dumbfounded. You couldn't even do this if you installed Microsoft Small Business Server 2008 today, unpatched, with the CA on default settings. | ||
| ▲ | agwa 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |
eMudhra had to jump through even more hoops. Obviously the system failed here, but it's a failure of a root certificate operator, not a sub-CA operator as claimed by eqvinox. | ||