| ▲ | sandworm101 2 hours ago | |||||||
That would depend on whether you are a user/customer or an investor/owner in AI. At the moment, nearly everyone is on the investor/owner side. The entire western world has doubled down on AI becoming the most popular product since the invention of fire. If it turns out that fire 2.0 cannot be patented/copyrighted/licensed for insane profits, those dollars disappear. | ||||||||
| ▲ | pmoriarty an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
The people who own these companies have more money than they, their families, and their extended families can spend for generations. None of them have to work a day in their life no matter what happens to these companies. Same with a lot of their investors, who will be just fine without the "insane profits" they hope for. I'm not worried about their welfare, and won't shed a tear if their companies collapse. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | jacquesm 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
> The entire western world has doubled down on AI becoming the most popular product since the invention of fire. That's a bit of a one-sided view. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | IsTom 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> nearly everyone is on the investor/owner side I think that "everyone" needs some kind of an asterisk. Who's "everyone" in this? | ||||||||