> Amortized cost of owning a DC full of GPUs is far less than $38/card/hr

You missed the bit where they used the word "revenue".

I suspect if you factor in all the various overheads of running datacentres the actual value is lower. Revenue is vanity, profit is sanity as the old saying goes.

However the Chinese do have the benefit that China are pushing hard on renewable energies. So at least that major part of the equation is probably far lower than your average US/EU site.

▲

Schlagbohrer 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Huge, generational mistake for the USA to be leaning so hard into fossil fuels right now and actively trying to prevent buildout of solar and wind power. That decision is just going to hurt more and more in the coming years as China's electricity costs continue to plummet while the US' continues to depend on unsustainable fossil fuel infrastructure.

▲

traceroute66 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> actively trying to prevent buildout of solar and wind power.

And actually paying people not to ! (Paying RWE $1.2bn to abandon wind contracts[1])

Its absolutely nuts. Pure generational can-kicking.

[1] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1e1vg0gjl5o

▲

mike_hearn 18 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Why? AI DCs can't rely on solar or wind so there must always be a thermal backstop. China is building lots of coal and nuclear.

▲

pmoriarty an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

One of countless mistakes made by the current administration. Decimating research funding and firing many scientists is another.

	▲	oblio an hour ago \| parent [-]
		It's not a mistake. It's deliberate harm.

▲

ac29 39 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Huge, generational mistake for the USA to be leaning so hard into fossil fuels right now and actively trying to prevent buildout of solar and wind power.

If the US is trying that, they are failing pretty hard - 88% of new power in the US in 2025 was renewables, and 2026 is estimated to be above 90%

▲

smolder 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's hilarious and depressing that one of Trump's supposed goals was making the US into an industrial powerhouse again, and yet he's acting to protect the profits of the fossil fuel industry as opposed to encouraging the kind of resource efficiency that would make the US competitive long term.

	▲	Gigachad an hour ago \| parent [-]
		The only thing he cares about right now is covering up the Epstein Files. Everything else is key jingling to get you looking elsewhere.

▲

graemep 34 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

China is investing in cheap and secure energy, which includes renewables, but it also include coal: https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/chinas-coal-power-ri...

The latter is great as a way of getting an edge in business and reducing reliance on oil supplies, but its also environmentally highly damaging.

▲

shawabawa3 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> You missed the bit where they used the word "revenue".

No they didn't...

> I suspect if you factor in all the various overheads of running datacentres the actual value is lower.

That's literally exactly what the quoted part addresses: "Amortized cost of owning a DC full of GPUs is far less than $38/card/hr". Cost of running GPUs is far less than $38/hour, revenue is $38/hour, ??? , profit