| ▲ | lmz 3 hours ago | |||||||
X.509v3 just has one issuer Name in the certificate, unless you're talking about something else? | ||||||||
| ▲ | wnoise 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Yeah, that's one of the complications. It would have to be ignored in processing, or multiple variants be presented at once (preferred). Certificates are not the same as the public key; multiple certs sharing the same key is essentially the way around this. It's not as elegant as identical signing of the same cert, but it could work. | ||||||||
| ||||||||