| ▲ | tensor 4 hours ago |
| State support has nothing to do with anything. Also, in practice the EU has its deepseek equivalent model in Mistral. |
|
| ▲ | user43928 17 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| I understand Mistral compared to DeepSeek Flash is less intelligent, late, more expensive, and a third of the speed. Equivalent might be stretching it. |
|
| ▲ | m00dy 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| never seen anyone using Mistral's models. |
| |
|
| ▲ | cheonic4040 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > Also, in practice the EU has its deepseek equivalent model in Mistral. In practice, European companies don’t use Mistral. First acknowledge the reality, then we can propose solutions. |
| |
| ▲ | omnimus 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | It is actually not unrealistic to imagine laws for eu gov software only to allow Mistral or Aleph alpha models. They are pretty good - on par with deepseek atleast. There are all kinds of similar requirements already from software stacks to databases. What I would see even more likely are requirements of no agent commits, use of only human written/vetted code under their name. | | |
| ▲ | msdz 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > on par with deepseek atleast For chatbot-style usage maybe, can’t really attest to that; for long-running, long-context “agentic” work including planning, within a harness etc., definitely not (yet). > What I would see even more likely are requirements of no agent commits, use of only human written/vetted code under their name. I mean in the end that’s what the Kernel project does now, IIRC? Everything has to have a response human’s sign-off. |
|
|
