| ▲ | 60secs 4 hours ago | |
Is there a single use case where you would not be better served using MiMo 2.6 Pro? https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/comparisons/mimo-v2-6-p... | ||
| ▲ | karakanb an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
Your link seems to be pointing to the older M3 model. The correct link is this: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/comparisons?compare=mim... | ||
| ▲ | sinuhe69 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
On Openrouter at least, all Mino models are painfully slow. TTFT is many seconds and the models spend a lot of time on its CoT, making effective output per second many times slower than DS Flash. On Flash 4.1, I constantly get ~180 tok/s and the real work got done fast, too. So even when the Mimo 2.6 are smart models, I use them much less recently. Not to mention their costs are also higher than DS. For me, the DeepSeek 4.1 models are currently the ultimate cost-effective model the rest have to match with, especially if you are not on a subscription plan with heavy discount. GPT Sol 6.1 is however, for me the most efficient model, both in terms of time to finish and token usage. | ||
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||