> I’m slowly coming around to the idea that if it works, I’m good with that.

A.k.a. "The concrete didn't crumble when I hit it with a hammer."

Process quality has been a thing for ages because it is essential.

I mean, honestly ? Yeah.

Except it’s about 1000 “hammers” (aka tests), x 9 different architectures, x 2 different (a reference and a production) variants, and x 3 different optimisation levels. Every time I find something that slipped through, it gets at least one test written to cover it in the future. My main time-sink is the hours it takes to run the ‘gate’ before a release across the test-farm. And that’s after I’ve been playing with it myself for a while, pushing corner-cases through whatever I’ve been working on.