| ▲ | SamBam 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
> [Urner Barry] also collects bids that egg producers make for each other’s surplus inventory on an exchange called Egg Clearinghouse, Inc. [It] takes in those bids even before they lead to any sale, as a signal of demand. > they had the ability to create the illusion of [consumer demand] through bids on the surplus exchange for purchases they had no intent of completing This seems like a system tailor-made for collision. It seems like the consumer protection agency should force changes. Too bad they've been made toothless. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | SoftTalker 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Yes, non-binding bids that are not actual sales should not signal anything. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | alyeska2 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
It's a system that is vulnerable to fraud, which is why it's good to have regulators who go after fraudulent actors. It's a perfectly fine system if the egg producers are using it genuinely, it's only a problem when they start submitting fraudulent bids to accomplish illegal market manipulation. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nekusar 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> This seems like a system tailor-made for collision. It seems like the consumer protection agency should force changes. Too bad they've been made toothless. Elections have consequences. This is one of them. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||