How does this compare and benchmark with https://github.com/apache/kvrocks

murtazayusuf 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I haven’t tested against it, that will be next, i will run the benchmarks on the same method and publish the results, or if you want to, you can as well. Even if it performs poorly, I will report that too like we did with dragonfly.

▲

sligbad 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Well Kvrocks is on disk, not in memory.

	▲	murtazayusuf 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		That's true, however the intention to run the benchmark would be against most of the widely used commands and see if there is any command or use case where kividb might be a better fit than kvrocks. strictly speaking from hardware performance, it would certainly beat kvrocks in terms of sheer throughput, but in terms of volume where does it stand would be something interesting to experiment.
	▲	ChocolateGod 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Kvrocks is both iirc, since it can cache the rocksdb data in memory.