Making LLM write code is super susceptible to generating problems imo.

You know it won't be properly reviewed and understood.

Using LLMs to review code is much more useful imo but it can also cause problems due to the natural lazyness of a person.

You wouldn't want the OS you are using to be developed by a dilligent but a low IQ and mediocre skill level programmer.

I'm not saying other people can't possibly use LLMs to generate code effectively but it seems super suspicious from my experience as it triggers laziness and reluctance to put effort into understanding every piece of code.

> You know it won't be properly reviewed and understood

Do you now?

> You wouldn't want the OS you are using to be developed by a dilligent but a low IQ and mediocre skill level programmer.

So you also know that people using LLMs to produce code are diligent but low IQ and mediocre skill?

> it triggers laziness and reluctance to put effort into understanding every piece of code.

Linus has been mostly reviewing code for what... decades? The rest of the contributors have been his LLM in some way. Would you say that he has gotten "reluctant to put effort into understanding every piece of code" he reviews?