Remix.run Logo
▲ bruce511 2 hours ago

You'll get downvoted for this because the US believes it is in the right.

The US sees itself as a "policeman" not a "gangster", they are out to save the world, not conquer it.

And yet, the line between the two is very blurry. Kuwait was justified, Iraq contrived. Afghanistan meaningless. Iran is a solution looking for a problem (nooo they can't have nuclear weapons, but who trashed JPOA?)

The 20th century was no better. The righteous of WW2 allows any excess, Vietnam being a poster child.

For the US to change they first need to accept they are the bad guy. And that's a very difficult thing to accept. The shiny uniform for example is what the good guy wears.

But in the end the gangster and police can be hard to tell apart.

▲adamsmark an hour ago | parent [-]

The US used to see itself as a policeman. It is now kinda going gangster.

You can't police a multipolar world - you can when you're the sole superpower in a unipolar word where "policing" can be a euphemism.

I think there is now a general or at least generational attitude shift about world policeman type stuff vs smash, grab and bully in America.

▲ivell an hour ago | parent [-]

Even in the past, US was more of a gangster supporting its gang rather than a fair hearted policeman. Its support to Pakistan during Bangladesh (East Pakistan) genocide is well known.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archer_Blood#The_Blood_Telegra...