| ▲ | ZiiS an hour ago | |
Wouldn't an LLM just write a python script to convert an intermediate language without the triggering phrases and letter counting. | ||
| ▲ | randomblock1 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
Yeah this is what they end up doing. The language itself isn't that hard for them, it's separating the language from the traps in the spec. I also tried making a hostile esolang, without all the prompt injections and whatnot, and it was very easy for LLMs. (It was mainly based around tokenizer quirks, like the r in strawberry test, but becomes trivial with scripts). | ||
| ▲ | dom96 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
This depends on them being able to interpret the spec correctly. They could certainly write a Python script, but their implementation would need to match the spec. I haven't seen any model attempt it this way so far. | ||
| ▲ | mycall an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
An LLM could equally decompile the binary, clean up the code, and recode it in one /goal. | ||
| ▲ | 32 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||