| ▲ | ikmckenz 3 hours ago | |
> I can prompt an LLM to refute this and it would give me 5 reasons ... Hard to read this and really come away with a sense of what the truth is. Are you arguing a meta point that there is no such thing as truth because LLMs can make you any counter argument to you want? That seems bleak. Argue against the actual points of the article. | ||
| ▲ | plasticeagle 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |
What points? Does the article make any points? I couldn't find any. For instance, point 1 ends with "A foreclosure suit is not a lost home — most end when the owner, or the owner's lender, pays — but the pressure is the point." Which makes no sense whatsoever. I thought they were making a housing crisis worse by forcing foreclosures, but now apparently "the pressure is the point." The point of what, exactly? | ||