On the bright side, don’t offer an exchange rate based on ethnicity or other background criteria but I get the feeling that your AI won’t be able to kill 49 billionaires without triggering something. Can probably do 49 millionaires without hitting the $1B threshold? Maybe someone will come up with a risk management SaaS as not all millionaires are the same and maybe you’ll hit the $1B before the 49th.

▲

LoganDark 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I feel like the surviving family of even a single millionaire could claim $1B in damages if the millionaire was young enough.

▲

mrtksn 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Right, so maybe they had an exchange rate after all. Just implicit.

I got the feeling that what they had in their mind was essentially culling the energy consumers with low economic output.

▲

LoganDark 3 hours ago | parent [-]

There's always been an exchange rate based on the quality of your legal team. Get one sociopathic enough and they'll pick a judge right apart.

	▲	mrtksn 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The dark humor aside, is it really a damage when AI kills 49 millionaires? After all it probably creates even more millionaires as their wealth is distributed to survivors. So the actual risk could be when AI kills 49 engineers since that actually may translate to losses for their employers.