| ▲ | RepRapMicron(github.com) |
| 184 points by RobotToaster 3 hours ago | 28 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | CarVac 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Related: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvV2CH5il3Q And the channel's preceding few videos covering the development of the prerequisite technologies. |
| |
| ▲ | chris_swart 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | This video was amazing, thank you for sharing. What are the main applications for this technology with a home setup? | | |
|
|
| ▲ | arjie 22 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I had no idea this kind of precision was possible with parts that are not particularly advanced. Most of my modeling and 3d printing is entirely AI driven these days. With this stuff, I could make even miniature parts and screws and so on. I’m a late adopter, so I’ll have to wait the 10 years or so before it reaches current Prusa/Bambu performance but it’s exciting nonetheless. |
| |
| ▲ | DannyBee 10 minutes ago | parent [-] | | It's because it's only 8mm cubic volume. But you can get etched glass scale encoders that will give you 1um accuracy for basically nothing these days (IE <50 bucks). You'd still be better off just using cheap linear motors with encoders built into the rail though. |
|
|
| ▲ | godber 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Thank god, in 18 months we can start making our own RAM. |
| |
|
| ▲ | le-mark 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I know it is a preposterous proposition to think this thing could create a 1/1000 version of itself, hence 1/1,000,000 3d printing, but why? |
| |
| ▲ | kadoban 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | A mechanism that works at scale X doesn't necessarily work at scale Y. Different forces and material properties are all at relatively different levels. The one I know offhand that will mess with stuff is the square-cube law. If you double the linear dimensions of something, it's twice as big, linearly, but 4 times the surface area and 8 times as heavy. The strength of anything that depends on area (like friction) won't scale at the same rate as anything that depends on mass or volume or anything. Not to mention I'm sure this thing can only print a few different materials. Unless those are also _all_ of the materials it's made out of, it couldn't even make itself. | |
| ▲ | generuso 44 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The history of precision machinery is a steady ladder of using old machines to produce new more accurate components, and then new more accurate machines. But simply making something smaller is not synonymous with it automatically becoming more accurate or capable of achieving higher resolution. If anything, very high precision machines are typically larger in size than the less accurate ones. | |
| ▲ | wongarsu 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Calling it a RepRap, with full explanation that that means a printer that can print itself, does make it sound like it could be a goal But even if you could get a positioning system that small, I'm pretty sure you can't scale resin printing down three orders of magnitude smaller than this printer. Maybe a tiny CNC? Or more likely they refer to eventually printing the mems devices used in the printer | | |
| ▲ | InsideOutSanta 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | None of the reprap 3D printers can fully make themselves. They all still need additional parts that can't be 3D-printed, like motors and controllers. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | swiftcoder 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I did not expect this would be achievable to such tight tolerances - this is very impressive. Excited to see a new wave of micro-manufacturing in our future |
|
| ▲ | post-it 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Does this mean we can print vinyl records? |
|
| ▲ | jlawrence6809 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Okay my tinker-lust has been aroused! Can someone tell me what I can make with this thing so I have an excuse to build it? |
| |
| ▲ | wongarsu 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | If you get this to print conductive resins you could probably build a number of mems devices. Accelerometers, gyroscopes, tiny speakers Being able to make structures this small could maybe make DIY inkjet printers viable, if you can simplify them enough? The most exciting are the applications nobody has thought of yet | |
| ▲ | varispeed 3 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | > has been aroused! You can finally print a 1:1 replica of your pee-pee. I get my coat. |
|
|
| ▲ | carterschonwald 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| omg, ive wanted a precision computer controlled flexure motion system for yearssssss. i may also just really love tiny tools and devices. |
| |
| ▲ | mlyle 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | So that's existed for a long time in the form of OpenFlexure. The microscope is a pretty easy / fun build. |
|
|
| ▲ | thenthenthen 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Very cool, and I understand the off the shelf parts ambition, but what are those usb microscopes used for? These are absolute garbage (but light weight). |
| |
| ▲ | wongarsu 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Sounds like they are used for homing. For that they just need to observe a tiny spot at known distance with high resolution To look at the output they recommend a separate regular microscope | |
| ▲ | ZiiS 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Phisics dictate they have a small depth of field but they can be absolutely incredible. | |
| ▲ | idiotsecant 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | To see the print? Weird comment. | | |
| ▲ | MobiusHorizons an hour ago | parent [-] | | The op asked because a usb microscope is basically unsuitable for seeing something this small with much clarity. From other replies it sounds like the purpose is for automated positioning which makes more sense. |
|
|