| ▲ | drawfloat 14 hours ago | |
Other options available: ruin the company financially, violate the terms of service of whatever system it uses and get the organisation banned, access business/customer data. If it’s that sensitive and there’s access keys accessible to anyone, it could end up much worse. Nobody said it was without inconvenience. | ||
| ▲ | orf 14 hours ago | parent [-] | |
This is so stupid. It’s pretty simple: malicious actors will use it to do all of those, plus now they can unilaterally bring down a system via revocation. Non-malicious actors using it to bring down a system via revocation are therefore indistinguishable from malicious actors. It’s by definition a malicious act. That’s why it’s a stupid idea. Non-malicious actors should just contact the company and let them take action. It’s not for an outsider to decide the impact of a leak. | ||