| ▲ | fullshark 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
It doesn't have what people want (an audience) | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | noosphr 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
And we replace one tyrant for dozens. It's not much of an improvement. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | superkuh 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
What the big social networks provide is the ability to transact money. No distributed non-corporation system can ever provide the money flows that make people use corporate social networks. Or, they can, but the instant they do they're legally attacked and destroyed. So no independent/distributed network can ever really draw those people who make up the majority who are chasing money or following those who chase money. The audience won't exist. | |||||||||||||||||