In this case you'd probably prefer your key to be disabled rather than spending $$$ on tokens for everyone else

Think that through - the person who stole the key has the decision to use it or revoke it through this hypothetical system.

If they are acting maliciously, they will take the choice that most hurts you and/or benefits them.

If the key is useless to them and revoking it hurts you, then they would do that.

If the key wasn’t useless to them, then… they would just use it and not revoke it?

It for whitehat third parties who discover unprotected keys obviously people intentionally stealing keys will not revoke them generally.

	▲	orf 34 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		And the whitehack hackers finding keys should do what, exactly? Unilaterally decide they should be revoked, without contacting the owner? And that’s not malicious?