| ▲ | mysterypie an hour ago | |
> It’s actually having the resources and economic capacity to make millions of them, enough to “replace all jobs.” Like that newfangled invention called the automobile. We could never produce millions of them to substantially replace all other means of transportation. EDIT: Joking aside, I think that when humanoid robots get good enough (I'm predicting 5-10 years), there will an insatiable demand for them in every possible residential and commercial application. If we have as many cars and portable supercomputers (i.e., cellphones) as we have people, why is it hard to imagine producing as many robots as we have people? | ||
| ▲ | keiferski an hour ago | parent [-] | |
Humanoid robots that perform human actions to the level of a human are orders of magnitude more complex than carriages with engines attached. And there’s also the economics of it all. They won’t replace people if people are cheaper. But I don’t disagree that eventually it’ll happen. Just that this has little to do with LLMs. | ||