| ▲ | devtor an hour ago | |
As a dev who hasn't used LLMs as an embedded part of their work, and uncertain about it all, i'd be curious to know: - How long do you reckon it would take a human to do the task? - What percentage of features/ feature-extensions you add would have been done at all if you didn't have agentic assistance? Is there a tension between llm productivity gains and 'because we can' feature additions? - Are many of the tasks for throwaway v1 features, exploratory tries? - How speced out is the work you give it, eg did this task have pages of specs, how long did the spec take to write? - How deeply will you manually review the work and how much time will it take? Will you read all the code / review at a high level and interrogate with llm / have the llm review and self iterate? | ||