| ▲ | Is MCP becoming the common foundation of smart, decentralised search?(contextetech.com) | |||||||
| 12 points by contextetech 2 hours ago | 9 comments | ||||||||
| ▲ | randomblock1 43 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
No, because HTTP already is. You can't have every MCP added. Every harness has a search tool, so just fetch data as needed. MCP isn't for search, it's for interacting. Sometimes that's search but mostly not. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | brap 17 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
For web services, what is the point of MCP or even a skill when modern agents can just find API docs on their own and use it? I think in this day and age agents no longer need official 3P integrations, they can just use whatever API is already available (and in some cases even the UI). | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | porori 11 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Decentralised search sounds weird to me. Searching always needs a centralised collection. | ||||||||
| ▲ | hobofan an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
> Three things still have to be built, server by server > citation Nope, as long as the MCP server exposes enough metadata to be cited (mostly trivial), citation is a job of the client/LLM. > trust Also just a function of the client. The server can't aid here at all as it's inherently untrustworthy in the system. > measurement Maybe. Though it's debatable how much measurement _each_ server needs, and whether that actually gives meaningful insight to optimize. This might as well be measured outside of the servers, in the client/a centralized logging system that also sees surrounding context. | ||||||||
| ▲ | troupo an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
As always, the answer to an article whose title is a yes/no question: no | ||||||||
| ▲ | usernametaken29 14 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
No | ||||||||
| ▲ | gjvc 13 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
no | ||||||||