I do it this way too. I think having the same lab's model review the code in a fresh session also helps, so I use both: I generally start a new Claude Code and a Codex and have them review the code with a focus on 3 things: 1. bugs, 2. cut corners, 3. code style.

This generally works for me. I think a solid spec is the key for the models to review against. I ask them to follow the spec, and if the spec doesn't say, follow first principles.

Also, if there is a user experience change, they need to notify me.

How about your pattern?