I saw someone say the other day (in response to another blog post being well written) that Anthropic employees have a rule against using AI for writing/external comms? That seems clearly not the case here, normal people don't write like this:

> Most of the path is automated; a person's attention goes where the risk is

> The eval grows with every incident, and every change to the reviewer is scored against all of it.

100%, although if people are getting 90% of their interaction from a robot, one may start to pick up some vocal tics and colloquialisms from machine world. a kind of robo-pidgin.

Pangram reports 80% of the text is AI-generated: https://www.pangram.com/history/72309aad-6e3f-4002-bdc5-c062...

this definitely seemed like something claude generated, i know because i frequently do all my research in chat and then ask it to generate a doc based on what we talked about and when i read what it generates the verbosity, the style it writes in makes me delete the whole thing. I would never subject readers to that.