| ▲ | jjcm 3 hours ago | |
It's editing capabilities have been really solid, but I've been disappointed with its ability to do finer text details (a niche use case for my own purposes). There's also a lot of reports of body horror outputs, but I haven't encountered any myself. Still though, it's a lot like the porsche mission S vs the tesla roadster situation with the weights release. Moss Image dropped which looks far better at the moment, leading to a "why Flux?" question in the community. I still think the edit capabilites are absolutely excellent, but for t2i I'd try out moss: https://huggingface.co/OpenMOSS-Team/MOSS-Image-Base/tree/ma... I've been VERY impressed with Moss' design capabilites out of the box. Some samples: https://image.non.io/9a32f732-668e-4fb3-bfef-13f0f40a0972.we... https://image.non.io/8b5ee315-1ffd-4985-8ff0-d62e19d33f29.we... https://image.non.io/5130501a-5c07-4635-82f5-fa64d60e8871.we... IMO the taste is lacking, but it has some of the best text reproductions I've seen with their new VAE. Here's a type ramp example: https://image.non.io/57246870-a245-4875-983f-993656e09e3d.we... | ||