People on reddit claim it's bad at generating images of people, apparently because they removed anything close to nsfw from the training set. Anyone already tried it?

▲

vunderba 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I've been running it through tests on my local machine. The Text-to-Image component is VERY poor. It's not a good sign when the stock ComfyUI Flux3 Klein template with built-in config/prompts produces SD 1.5 levels of half-melted faces and various other body horror.

Flux 2 Klein 9b also had anatomical issues as well, but this one feels practically lobotomized.

https://imgpb.com/wDGGs

▲

minimaxir 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Some examples of the Reddit posts/memes:

https://reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1x79gth/why/

https://reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1x7ktbu/enshit...

I gave Flux 3 Klein my typical human test that has never failed on newer image models and it did fail; in addition to lower quality, the fingers were definitely not the correct proportions.

Whether the cause is due to more safeguards against NSFW content is hard to confirm technically; it was more an intuition back in the Stable Diffusion XL days but I suspect modern training paradigms are better at correlative inference.

▲

tetraodonpuffer 3 hours ago | parent [-]

did you try with https://huggingface.co/black-forest-labs/flux-3-image-klein-... apparently the model is not going to work well unless this type of "prompt upsampler" is added

	▲	minimaxir 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I did it in OpenRouter, which hits the direct BFL API.

▲

ThrowawayTestr 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Lame. Back to Chroma it is then.

▲

spottedmarley 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

There's a base version for LoRA training so a porn adapter is likely already being built.