Well, the key thing is that I don't want slop, period. I think a human should take the time and write it up. Honestly, my impression was the opposite-- it seemed like classic AI overly-jargony bullet point stuff.

I'm glad that people are using whatever tools are effective to find bugs, but if you expect a human audience to read about your findings, then is it not unreasonable to ask a human to write it? Most of the time a bug reveals a flaw in logic, and in operating systems, sometimes those logical flaws are informative, and lead to new and better designs, not just bug fixes. So there are potentially missed opportunities here.

>if you expect a human audience to read about your findings, then is it not unreasonable to ask a human to write it?

in this case, it appears that a human did write it, and then you complained that it wasnt good.

a no-win situation, apparently.