| ▲ | robotresearcher a day ago |
| > So, in short: they want AI to take the good jobs No, we are currently unable to do most tasks that require physical manipulation, independent of what anyone wants. |
|
| ▲ | Forgeties79 a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| Guarantee you it’s more feasible with the insane investment we have been seeing than dc’s in space are. |
|
| ▲ | airstrike a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| If by "currently" you mean "for the foreseeable future", then sure. |
| |
| ▲ | jebarker a day ago | parent [-] | | Are you suggesting this is isn’t currently true in the conventional use of the word? | | |
| ▲ | airstrike 21 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yes, currently means "right now" not "for the foreseeable future". | | |
| ▲ | jebarker 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | Right. The person you responded to made a statement entirely about “right now” and used the word “currently”. You added in the discussion about the future, they said nothing about that. | | |
| ▲ | airstrike 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The entire discussion about AI taking jobs is by definition about the future. Nobody is saying "AI took our jobs" so talking about what it can currently do is nearly irrelevant | |
| ▲ | an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
|
|
