| ▲ | jandrese an hour ago |
| Oh, it doesn't require a person to continually monitor it now? I missed that change. Until that happens I don't think it qualifies as "full" self driving. |
|
| ▲ | 827a an hour ago | parent [-] |
| Only from a regulatory perspective. Anyone who drives a Tesla for long enough knows how to defeat the monitoring system, and doing so is extremely safe; significantly safer than a human driver. I would have no concerns summoning it autonomously over 100 miles, once the law allows for that to happen. |
| |
| ▲ | sumeno an hour ago | parent [-] | | I've never crashed driving drunk so drunk driving is safer than driving sober | | |
| ▲ | 827a an hour ago | parent [-] | | Well, you're insane for thinking that. Drunk driving is very unsafe, and population-level statistics don't lie. They're quite conclusive when it comes to grading the safety of drunk driving as being dangerous relative to sober driving, and Tesla's full self driving system as being safe relative to sober driving. | | |
| ▲ | sumeno an hour ago | parent [-] | | Where are the independently verified statistics for FSD being safer? |
|
|
|